--- title: DancingDrawing created: 2015-12-22 19:05 updated: 2017-02-12 12:58 revision: 30 author: Auriea summary: adding background --- [[Writing]] [[DrawingDancing]] [[background:DancingDrawing-image2|repeat #00FF00 scroll top]] **A report of the FOAM micro-residency [http://fo.am/microresidency-auriea-harvey/], part of series of thought and drawing experiments that I call [[TheLivingLine]] [http://auriea.com/thelivingline/]** *The D&D micro-residency workshop took place on December 2nd and was attended by Auriea Rasa, Stevie, Nicholas, Maja (who also facilitated and took great notes.) The lovely photo-documentations are by Rasa and by Nik.[https://www.flickr.com/photos/foam/sets/72157661494693736]* https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/649/23386951742_41aa815b47_b.jpg The wonderful thing about foam is that they provide a space to figure things out, even when you are not sure resolution can be achieved, they say there is always a next step. https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/716/23413091441_f9d8573256_z.jpg I am an artist who Draws. I draw habitually, obsessively, privately, publicly. I have wanted to formalize my habit of drawing during dance performances I attend. I want to make work which more directly in a way that involves the performers. I have had visions of DANCE married to DRAWING in my head for many years. ### PRESENTATION Firstly, I gave a short presentation [https://www.icloud.com/keynote/000LZSpLbedhTA3nZntPYM7Xg#D&D]. I expressed my confusion and my motivation, my existential doubts over the whole idea. Maybe I simply like looking at dancers in motion and would like translate that into drawing in motion? Maybe, as a representational artist I find that dancers make good subjects because their bodies and movements make more interesting forms, interesting subjects? I am not interested in being the performer myself, at least not in any direct way which leads to drawing in public. I find the idea of flailing my body about, piece of charcoal in hand, in front of an audience abhorrent. But I am very interested in finding ways of using my body to better understand what dancing is and what a Dancer does. And I wonder if knowing more about what I am drawing and making links to that other artistic practise can lead to better drawings. But the artefact at the end, the eternal truth of the drawing is paramount to my goal. What happens before is private.[https://www.youtube.com/embed/bOiArQvlzKU] I showed artists whose work with Dancing/Drawing inspires me: Anne-Teresa de Keersmaeker [https://www.icloud.com/keynote/000LZSpLbedhTA3nZntPYM7Xg#D&D], William Kentridge [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2-n5Kvw9v4A], Nicolas Gansterer[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Gk8nedJfi4], Andros Zins-Browne [https://vimeo.com/123096981]. Upon reflection, when I am looking at performances I have a preference for the motions of the everyday[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KMZFzjtDVA] and of the absurd [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbMryE_09cA], as opposed to variations of traditional dance, like modern ballet [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NghGmjtxeak]. If I must have traditional dance I like the tradition laid bare a historical re-enactment [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CufiBOh6mc]. Similarly in the drawings I admire there is a rigorous discipline, a silver thread of the traditional [https://youtu.be/Oqq38yNlE_g], or there is a blistering fresh awareness of what making that drawing means [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tyndlMIgbnU]. The artist, in her place, within and outside the lines. Dicussion followed. https://c1.staticflickr.com/1/696/23123636979_3f98997082.jpg ### DISCUSSION The point was made that what I am looking for is not a representation of dance nor a way of using dance to physically make a drawing but a **SYNTHESIS** of Dancing and Drawing which makes an artefact that goes beyond a representational drawing or the perfomane which may be used to create it. **COMPOSITION** was another keyword which came up to describe the overlapping goals I have for creation of a work. There was discussion of how musical composition and choreography have gone hand in hand historically. I must further research how dance was represented along with music notation in the Renaissance and Baroque periods. It was suggested that I look to the manuscripts of Hildegard von Bingen (which can be viewed in Dendermonde)[http://alamirefoundation.org/en/publications/hildegard-bingen-symphonia-harmoniae-caelestium-revelationum-dendermonde-st-pieters-pau] and Thoinot Arbeau [http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/h?ammem/musdibib:@field(NUMBER+@band(musdi+219))], for ways that music notation and dance notation were developed in tandem in the past. Also worth looking into the grammar of gesture in Baroque dance [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Fas65lT3fE] and it was suggested that to learn more I could perhaps make contact with Anna Yepes [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QW-z-XYTniA] who is a specialist of spanish baroque dance. We didn’t talk that much about tools, unfortunately. But someone mentioned that I should experiment with Zoetropes or other animated forms. I brought up other ways of looking at a dance such as the black mirror and we envisioned a black mirrored floor of a performance hall. For it is not the performance but the intentionality of the created artefact and its aesthetic effect that I am interested in. On this I have demands. I feel it is important to draw from life. And in this live drawing not merely recording a gestural trace and nor memorizing a frozen pose but, I stressed, the primacy of active memory in drawing what is moving. Visual memory is an important principle of representational art, from the sight-size method [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0QeUviRgqY] to gesture drawing [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cb3ad2mA8y4] from one’s own imagination. Can a static work of visual art be considered time-based? We pondered how a performance lives on in one’s memory and one continues to ‘see’ and interpret it through drawing. The drawing continues the performance after the fact. It was said that this goes against contemporary relations to time, by crossing time frames which exist between the now and the then, becoming a performative notion of visual experience. What does it mean to make a drawing and then repreat it 20 times? I had to admit while I have copied many artworks from the old-masters I have never repeated a drawing of my own enough to answer that question. But I am curious to try. These were all very interesting topics of discussion which gave me a lot of food for thought. We discussed methods of choreography in contemporary dance. These are of interest to me because I felt there could be some helpful language exchange with the type of drawing I hope to make. It was noted that an observation and response or ping-pong dialog between dancer and drawer was perhaps less interesting than a more direct cooperation. Yves Klein was summoned. http://www.artitude.eu/immagini/pillole-di-arte/antropometrie-1509102153570.jpg But this takes me further away from my stated aesthetic goal and toward becoming the public performer again. We looked for another angle. The Choreographic principles of William Forsythe.